Thursday, January 2, 2014

Glock 22 Generation 3 .40 Review/Range Report!

RANGE REPORT

PISTOL: GLOCK 22 GENERATION 3 .40


It is widely known that Glock pistols are one of, if not THE, most reviewed brand of handgun in the world (and for good reason). There are more than a few “Range Reports” and “Reviews” on the numerous Glock models, generations, and calibers and there is virtually nothing more that can be said about Glock that hasn’t been said already. It seems that even the positive opinions (provided by Glock advocates) and negative opinions (provided by Glock’s very few opponents) differ ever so slightly rendering opinions as more of a “universal” analysis than a “difference in opinion”. With that being said, I am giving you my personal “experience” with my newly acquired Glock 22 Generation 3 .40 pistol which doesn’t necessarily reflect others experiences with this pistol, though I’m sure many will find my review/range report quite familiar! This is my first ever Review/Range Report so go easy on me!

I purchased this pistol on June 30th, 2013 from a private seller in my area for $500.00 cash (yes, the cost is a little steep but with Colorado’s new gun laws going into effect on July 1st, 2013 the “value” of firearms saw a significant increase). The Glock 22 Gen 3 is my second Glock purchase, replacing my Glock 22 Gen 2 .40 which I never took to the range (I had the Gen 2 for only a week or so before selling it to purchase the gen 3). My reasoning behind “upgrading” from the Gen 2 to the Gen 3 was that I could achieve a better “purchase” on the weapon with its finger grooves and I like the option of a Picatinny rail for accessories such as lights and lasers. The pistol came with 3 15 round magazines and a case and the gentleman I purchased the pistol from claims to have only placed approximately 400 rounds or so through the pipe. Judging off of the 2 pins above the trigger guard, this particular pistol was manufactured post 2002 and was in near perfect shape with the exception of very little holster wear.

The Glock 22 Generation 3 .40 is a striker fired, safe action pistol which holds 15 rounds with an optional 17 round magazine. The measurements are as follows:

• Overall Length: 7.32 inches
• Barrel Length: 4.5 inches
• Overall Height: 5.43 inches
• Overall Width: 1.18 inches
• Weight (Loaded): 34 ounces
• Sight Radius: 6.5 inches
• Trigger Pull: 5.5 lbs.

After 4 days of chomping at the bit to take the Glock 22 Gen 3 to the range and test her out I cleaned, lubed, and packed it up and visited my local pistol range to give it a go. I purchased 100 rounds of Federal Range/Practice ammunition, 4 targets, threw on my “eyes” and “ears”, loaded up the magazines, and took my place in Lane #6! Based on previous experiences with .40 pistols, I know very well that the .40 cartridge is a “snappy” little round that generally causes quite a bit of “muzzle flip” resulting in decreased accuracy and I expected nothing less out of the Glock 22. I was wrong! My first 15 shots were taken at a distance of 7 yards and I managed to place all 15 shots center mass in a 2 inch grouping. Not too bad for an intermediate shooter with ZERO experience with a Glock 22. I will say, the first 15 rounds through the pipe inflicted slight discomfort in my hands partially due to the recoil and in part due to my grip. After adjusting my grip to a firm, thumbs forward purchase, and another 15 rounds or so down range, I felt as comfortable (if not more) firing this pistol as I have with any other handgun.

During my range session, I practiced at distances of 5, 7, 15 and 25 yards. At the 5 and 7 yard marks, I was dead center in groupings of 2 inches or less. At 15 and 25 yards, I noticed that I was shooting slightly high right to point of aim which may be due to my lack of recoil adjustment (any other ideas or suggestions?) but still managed groupings of less than 5 inches. I practiced slow fire, rapid fire, dominant hand only (right), off hand only (left), and drawing from my hip and was able to put a round on target using each method, every time. Not surprisingly, I experienced absolutely ZERO issues with this pistol, even when I attempted to “limp wrist” or cause the pistol to malfunction in any way. Every time the trigger was pulled, she went “BANG” and eagerly asked for another! I have found my personal defense weapon.

I am curious to hear about anybody else’s experience with this particular pistol and look forward to discussing this with you fine folks! Thank you for reading! Take care…

Brandon


View the original article here

Wednesday, January 1, 2014

French M51 Helmet question

Okay, I realize this might seem out place, but I don't have any other forum to turn to and, besides, this is the 'general' section of this forum.
That said, I do apologize if this bugs anybody.

I have two French M51 helmets, both advertised as 'originals'. One from 1954 (stamped inside the top of the helmet) with swivel bales ... and one from 1962 which has fixed bales.
Though there are some differences in the slope and front/back brim, the French M51 looks a lot like the American M1 and those 1962 fixed bales certainly look like the earliest 1942 version of the M1.
So, my particular question is -- knowing that the American helmet switched FROM fixed bales (because they could snap off) to swivel bales -- do you think it's possible that the French M51 helmet began with swivel bales and then (evidently in 1962) tried fixed bales?
Jeff

Last edited by jeff7salter; Yesterday at 06:40 PM. Reason: added space

View the original article here

Caliber size wound effects on the human body

The following video was originally produced for a medical conference. It shows a 60 liter bottle (132 pounds) being shot by different calibers.

http://youtu.be/Cz8b3gMwld4

The 9mm produces a small hole which the water leaks out of, however, the jug is not moved. The 357 Magnum seems to have more effect on the jug but not by much. A burst of 9mm fire from an MP5 rips the jug apart. One round from an AK47 makes the jug jump several inches off the ground causing the water to shoot out the hole created. A burst from the AK47 is an impressive display causing the jug to literally explode. The 5.56mm doesnt cause nearly the same effect. The 50 caliber is the most impressive causing the jug to explode and moving it a few feet.

For home defense I would have to say the AK47 is probably the best choice. It is a practical rifle which seemed to have a good effect on the jug. I did notice the difference between the 357 and the 9mm, but the difference was not so great in my opinion. A 3-5 shot burst with +p+ 9mm will really intensify the effect whereas one round does not move the jug.

One might look at this and conclude the 9mm is not an effective round, however, it is much easier to fire off a burst from the 9mm pistol then it is with the 357 revolver. There doesnt appear to be a lot of difference on the jug between the 9mm and 357, but there is a great difference with a burst of fire with hot 9mm.

So if I was going to choose a self defense pistol based on this video I would go with a full sized high capacity 9mm loaded with +p+ rounds and focus on 3 shot bursts in training. In rifle calibers I believe the AK47 is the winner.


View the original article here

FN Five Seven - Worth the price

I've been watching the availability of 5.7 ammo for the last half year, and unless I buy on the Internet, I cannot get any more than the 5 boxes I got in late December. Here's what I can find right now, and for me, it's too expensive to shoot (as much as I'd like to shoot one).

American Eagle 5.7x28mm 40 Gr. FMJ 50rds (AE5728A) 41 mins ago $0.80/rd [$39.99] [in stock] [LAX Ammo]
FNH-USA 5.7 x 28 mm SS197SR 40 Grain V-Max - a - 50 Rounds per Box 8 hours ago $0.80/rd [$39.97] [in stock] [Ammunition Depot]
500 Rounds Federal Fiocchi 5.7x28 40gr TMJ - Made in USA, AE5728A $0.75/rd [$375.00] [in stock] [Eagle Eye Guns]
5.7x28mm FNH SS197 V-Max 40 Grain 50 Round Box 2034 fps Blue Polymer Tipped Projectile $1.02/rd [$51.19] [in stock] [CheaperThanDirt]
FN 5.7 40 Grain Sporting Round (200 Rounds) $0.95/rd [$189.95] [in stock] [US Armorment]
5.7x28mm 27 Grain JHP Lead Free FNH SS195LF - 50 Rounds $1.80/rd [$89.99] [in stock] [Surplus Ammo]
Federal AE 5.7X28mm 40gr FMJ 50 rounds $0.98/rd [$48.99] [in stock] [Goose Island]

For example, I got my CZ75 earlier this year, and I've shot it thousands of times to date. Lately ball ammo has become available in the low twenty cent per round range. I believe that the lowest price that I've heard of for 5.7 the last six months is $0.44/round, but that's what I've heard - I haven't seen it. I have seen upper fifty cent range, but it was gone before I could have obtained any. Basically, available ammo for the 5.7 is roughly three times as expensive as 9mm, and for me that is too much.

Last edited by CurlyQ.Howard; Today at 12:25 AM.

View the original article here

7mm-08 experience?




ReplyOld Today, 03:26 AM Recoil energy from a 243 is about 9lbs, for a standard factory load, while the 7-08 develops about 12 lbs. There are two ways of looking at this: It's only 3lbs more recoil, or it has 33% more recoil.

The bottom line is that each shooter perceives recoil differently, such that an ill-fitting 7-08 and it's 12 pounds of recoil just might be enough to bother a young, inexperienced rifleman. Certainly anyone who has fired a lot of centerfire ammo won't be concerned by such a small difference. The two main things to do are making sure the stock fits well, with a good quality recoil pad, and then work them up to the more powerful loads with a 223 or other light-kicking rifle.

Reply With Quote Old Today, 03:29 AM Recoil energy from a 243 is about 9lbs, for a standard factory load, while the 7-08 develops about 12 lbs. There are two ways of looking at this: It's only 3lbs more recoil, or it has 33% more recoil.

The bottom line is that each shooter perceives recoil differently, such that an ill-fitting 7-08 and it's 12 pounds of recoil just might be enough to bother a young, inexperienced rifleman. Certainly anyone who has fired a lot of centerfire ammo won't be concerned by such a small difference. The two main things to do are making sure the stock fits well, with a good quality recoil pad, and then work them up to the more powerful loads with a 223 or other light-kicking rifle.

Reply With Quote Reply




All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:40 AM.

View the original article here

A question of scope.

Neither is a high-quality optic; having said that, either one may very well give you good service for your particular uses. When I choose between inexpensive scopes, I usually choose the one that seems clearest/brightest to my eye and go with it. I recently chose a Bushnell Sportview 3-9x40 a rifle I bought had on it over a Simmons based on that criterion, and so far, so good.

As for accuracy of adjustment and durability, those factors are always a crapshoot with inexpensive scopes -- the scope may hold zero and last forever, or be a goner after a half-dozen rounds.


View the original article here

SVT40 vs. SKS45

Forum Rules Firearms Safety Firearms Photos Links Library Lost Password Email Changes Sorry, I could not read the content fromt this page.

View the original article here